Water inequalities in cities : Abidjan, Ivory Coast
In
Abidjan, Ivory
Coast, the
water resources are managed by SODECI,
a private corporation that obtained a concession from the Ivory Coast
Government in the sixties. Until
1998, 95% of the households of Abidjan had an access to drinking
water, in contrast with 43% nationally. But from 1999 to 2011, there
was a succession of politic crisis (a succession of coups) which
resulted in a
service instability, and
as
of today, only 70% of the inhabitants have a regular and safe access
to water.
As
shown on the map, the city can be splitted in three zones, depending
on its access to water:
(Map 1
: Safe water access in Abidjan and the resulting
conflicts; adapted from ONEP's data)
- The
first zone (red), considered as in "extreme difficulty", is
where the city got wildly extended in slums. In these neighborhoods,
people only have access to drinking water for 2-6 hours/day, mostly
during night time. They experiment cuts and limited pressure
(1min/L). This zone includes Abidjan's biggest neighborhood, Abobo,
1,39 millions of inhabitants.
- The
second zone (orange), includes the neighborhoods in “difficulty”.
The water is available for 6 to 12 hours a day, and the pressure is
still low (45s/L).
- The
third zone (yellow), which is the city center (Plateau, Adjamé and
Treichville), is “privileged” and doesn't experience any
problems.
(Slums
in Abobo)(landportal.org)
With
that said, and considering the major drop in the access to water in
1999, how deep are the politic crisis in terms of responsibility in
the disparities I just pointed out ?
I.
A spatial partition – snowball effect.
When
the instabilities started in 1999, a lot of inhabitants did what
seems fair to do – they moved to the city rather than staying
isolated in the countryside. But Abidjan wasn't prepared for that :
in 1998, 2,87 millions of inhabitants were living there, and in ten
years, they had to welcome around 5 million more, which resulted in
the creation of slums in the suburbs, such as Abobo, Cocody, Port
Bouet, Yopougon and Koumassi, cities that represent 71% of the entire
city's population.
On the
other hand, there was no time for resources planning too : although
the population was growing of 25% a year, the water available was
only growing by 5% a year. That probably explains the cuts during day
time : the supplies simply run out of water. Are you wondering why
there wasn't more water available ? Well, because groundwater basins
need to renew themselves with rainfalls. The problem is, the
populations settled on these basins which blocks the renewing. As of
today, the main groundwater is exploited at 90%, which isn't
sustainable and is a long-term issue.
Therefore,
the politic crisis indirectly provoked this problem.
II.
What are the consequences ?
The
first obvious
consequence
is the discomfort caused by such a random availability. People, and
especially women and children who are responsible for the water have
to fetch water at night. Very often, the water supply isn't even
close to the house : this
survey reports that 42% of the inhabitants of the “extreme
difficulty” and “difficulty” zones have to walk for more than
1km to fetch water, while 39% walk for between 500 meters and 1km.
Let's note that the OMS standard is to keep every household closer
than 200 meters from at least one water supply. This distance and
water availability schedules therefore occasions tiredness, which
leads to sicknesses and non-focusing at school.
(Queuing
up to get water) (abidjantv.net)
But
the consequences aren't just about people's health : they are also
economic and social. According to the previous survey, it costs 2.6
times to these inhabitants to fetch water outside of their homes than
having the water in their own tapes, because in addition of paying
the fees, they have to buy a lot of costly items to stock and carry
water or to buy bottled water.
Some
social tensions resulting of the rarity of clean water can be
observed. According to the ONEP, the more the neighborhood is in
difficulty, the more tensions take place (see map 1), such as
protests, riots, fights to be the first to get water, or supplies
destruction. These tensions are caused by the high fees of
subscription to the water distribution, because the inhabitants of
the neighborhoods in difficulty think it is unfair for them to pay as
much as the people who don't encounter issues and have unlimited
water. It is no surprise that almost the half of the protests and
other issues take place in privileged neighborhoods : the inhabitants
of the zones in difficulty have to walk there to fetch water, and
there's a certain logic in protesting in privileged zones to be
heard.
(A
protest against SODECI) (lepointsur.com)
III.
Since the end of politic instability in 2011, which improvements have
been made or are planned to take place ?
According
to the law, in Ivory Coast, the SODECI has to make sure the water is
produced and distributed at every moment of the day, an objective
they can't meet because of the lack of infrastructures. On the other
hand, the State has to invest in new water supplies : that is why
there weren't any improvements or new projects during all the crisis
years.
But
what about now ?
The
State is
planning on acting on this issue, by connecting the
neighborhoods in difficulty to the water service first thing, or
creating new supplies throughout the city. They are also getting
investments from private corporations such as the Société Générale
(a French bank) to get more performing water systems, as shown in the
infography below.
(Source
: Société Générale website, click
to learn more)
In
conclusion, I think it is fair to say that politics have had a big
influence on today's issues, because of the coups between 1999 and
2011 that kept the politics away from providing safe water to some of
Abidjan's weakest neighborhoods.
Commentaires
Enregistrer un commentaire